Comments on: Reimagining www.asp.net – Introduction http://john-sheehan.com/blog/reimagining-www-asp-net-introduction/ Sun, 05 Sep 2010 17:46:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: karl http://john-sheehan.com/blog/reimagining-www-asp-net-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-14889 karl Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:18:07 +0000 http://john-sheehan.com/blog/reimagining-www-asp-net-introduction/#comment-14889 It'll be interesting when you get to part 3, but these are fundamental issues. When you compare <a href="http://www.asp.net" rel="nofollow">www.asp.net</a> to the other major web stacks (php, ruby and django) the difference is staggering. The open source stack's websites all have no advertising, cleaner and easier to use sites, and better quality content. <br><br>I'm pretty sure that MS' solution to throw money at the problem IS the problem. They should simply cut their budget down to relative pennies and see what they can make of it. It'll be interesting when you get to part 3, but these are fundamental issues. When you compare http://www.asp.net to the other major web stacks (php, ruby and django) the difference is staggering. The open source stack's websites all have no advertising, cleaner and easier to use sites, and better quality content.

I'm pretty sure that MS' solution to throw money at the problem IS the problem. They should simply cut their budget down to relative pennies and see what they can make of it.

]]> By: karl http://john-sheehan.com/blog/reimagining-www-asp-net-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-14775 karl Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:18:07 +0000 http://john-sheehan.com/blog/reimagining-www-asp-net-introduction/#comment-14775 It'll be interesting when you get to part 3, but these are fundamental issues. When you compare <a href="http://www.asp.net" rel="nofollow">www.asp.net</a> to the other major web stacks (php, ruby and django) the difference is staggering. The open source stack's websites all have no advertising, cleaner and easier to use sites, and better quality content. <br><br>I'm pretty sure that MS' solution to throw money at the problem IS the problem. They should simply cut their budget down to relative pennies and see what they can make of it. It'll be interesting when you get to part 3, but these are fundamental issues. When you compare http://www.asp.net to the other major web stacks (php, ruby and django) the difference is staggering. The open source stack's websites all have no advertising, cleaner and easier to use sites, and better quality content.

I'm pretty sure that MS' solution to throw money at the problem IS the problem. They should simply cut their budget down to relative pennies and see what they can make of it.

]]> By: James Senior http://john-sheehan.com/blog/reimagining-www-asp-net-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-14767 James Senior Tue, 22 Sep 2009 01:25:33 +0000 http://john-sheehan.com/blog/reimagining-www-asp-net-introduction/#comment-14767 Looking forward to reading your posts! Looking forward to reading your posts!

]]> By: Lee Dumond http://john-sheehan.com/blog/reimagining-www-asp-net-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-14766 Lee Dumond Mon, 21 Sep 2009 06:33:11 +0000 http://john-sheehan.com/blog/reimagining-www-asp-net-introduction/#comment-14766 This should be good, really looking forward to it. The <a href="http://asp.net" rel="nofollow">asp.net</a> site in its current form is about the WORST advertisement for <a href="http://asp.net" rel="nofollow">asp.net</a> as a technology there is.<br><br>I think the main problem is that the site's performance is awful. It's bloated and slow, and posting on the forums is a nightmare. It badly needs a makeover. This should be good, really looking forward to it. The asp.net site in its current form is about the WORST advertisement for asp.net as a technology there is.

I think the main problem is that the site's performance is awful. It's bloated and slow, and posting on the forums is a nightmare. It badly needs a makeover.

]]>